Official Theresa Longo Fanpage

 People is gladly doing devilish business creating articles sure to make the Royal Family hot under the collars. Seems innocent enough but it's a part of a coordinated public relations campaign to create distaste for the Institution while "Rallying" and pivoting more people toward Team Sussex. We've confirmed People magazine to be directly doing business with Markle -- even before the "5 Friends" fiasco.  The tone of this article & others portrays time old tradition, honor and dignity as outdated and archaic in thinly veiled swipes without context. Throughout our longstanding career in News Media it is always a pleasure to be well informed and dignified when meeting VIPS, Celebrities, Participants, or Royalty! Curtsying is a common courtesy in many decent places. Protocol cards are much appreciated way to maintain one's own dignity at such an important function. The above article divulges the cards in an obnoxiously tasteless way and seeks to make a ...

 Astonishingly particularly on Twitter as many of you have witnessed, accounts who break news on or speak on (favorable or not) the duplicit duo are being silenced, banned and permenantly suspended with no warning or recourse option. Not only that, we are a testament that real, verifiable businesses associated with accounts discussing H&M are also taken down. Yes, entire innocent networks are being algorithmically banned just by way of being identified in a social media network. It happened to @Barkjack. Mass reporting triggers the ban; it's almost impossible to reverse as the amount of appeals, bans and reports far outnumber human 'Twitter Police' to review and potentially overturn them. Due to the sheer volume of reports, Twitter somewhat understandably utilizes algorithms, keywords, etc, to aid in regulation of user activity on the platform.  Our technical forensics team uncovered how these social network bans happen. Using simple, free online programs, one can analy...