BarkJack Content Re-Visited!

We have operated without incident being the first to break multiple instances of news from revealing Gwen Stefani's nuptials months in advance to Khloe's publicity plans around a fake engagement,  we broke news hinting at Rihanna's pregnancy months in advance of all other outlets - in fact, it was the day she found out herself and made calls. We also told followers in real time about the horrific Orlando Nightclub shooting as it unfolded. We broke news of KimYe divorce ahead of all other news outlets. While other outlets were reporting reconciliation between Khloe and Tristan we told followers about his cheating ways. Yet another item we told followers was that Wendy Williams was NEVER coming back, with certainty. We were also the first to report Brad and Angie divorce. We were the first outlet before all others to report Meghan Markle's first pregnancy. We also forewarned Megxit and told you December 2019 ahead of their statement that their leave was "INDEFINITE". 


Barkjack was targeted and mis-classified as Spam (Opens in a new tab). A man named Christopher Bouzy took credit for this - a man who we have confirmed to be working on behalf of the Sussex PR team, utilizes a network of bots & real people to execute mass reports triggering suspensions. We are not spam. We are two former RAI 1 journalists who dedicated @BARKJACK to breaking truth.

We break headline news, triple verified. 

Without further adieu, let's revisit some of our headlines from the old account which should never have been suspended in the first place: 










LOOK AT THAT TWEET FROM AUGUST 2021 AND NOTICE HOW KATY NOW ALSO HAS A HOME IN KENTUCKY. Lately KP spent more time in KY than Montecito. 







While we do hope to recover Barkjack account, our new and only account operates now @BarkJack_ 

Thanks to all of you who follow very close! We appreciate you sharing our passion for truthful reporting.

Comments

  1. Love you guys, you're the real thing! Hopefully Musk restores your original account to you. <3

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did anyone else hear Bit Sentinal getting a rather dismissive mention, dismissive of their methods, in the Heard /Depp trial? From memory it was one of Amber’s own witnesses.

    ReplyDelete
  3. C.B. is a scam artist . Just look at all his clients. Someone at Twitter has his back. M.M. has several bot teams. Besides C.B., there is also omid scobie who has thousands of fake accounts on twitter.. Even back at the time of megxit, Scobies account was rated at 30% fake by twitter. This is how m.m. is controlling comment feeds on online news outlets. People must see what m.m is all about after yesterdays Texas drama, using dead kids for p.r..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. But surely it’s helpful for his links to the publicly exposed vile Amber, verified in a Court BY HER OWN PEOPLE, to be more widely know by those still blind to the nasty brute and the twisted games being played? Wish a journalist would pick up the connection.

      Delete
  4. Something I would like you to consider, this Jubilee is clearly showing the Cambridges are being cut off from any Sussex planning. Kensington Palace has been surprised by some of the developments that occurred of which they were not privy to, like the fact the Sussexes were coming. They found out with the rest of us. I don't know what game Her Majesty and/or Charles are playing to placate Harry but it's at the expense of William who they believe can weather whatever they decide without him. So everyone should prepare to anticipate a "royal" moment that is not categorically a "family" moment for the world's cameras to capture with the Sussexes very much in the frame. If your royal source is Kensington Palace attached, be skeptical that they really know what's what since KP is now being sidelined.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would love to hear more about if the duo is actually in England, and how they ended up there if it’s true. It sounds like there have been a lot of conversations back and forth-what’s the scoop?

    ReplyDelete
  6. You were wrong though about the Sussex not attending the Jubilee. You phrased it as "not being 100%." This is similar to your news about Meghan not getting an audience with the Queen, and when it was divulged that she had tea with the Queen, you made a technical definition of what "getting an audience" means. You were wrong again and you need to double-check your sources because they're no longer giving reliable information on royal gossip.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT HAPPENED TO @BARKJACK

Devil is in Details

A NEW EXCLUSIVE!!!