A Family Meeting

*UPDATED for Clarity***  We decided to update fan here today instead of on Twitter due to the barrage of hatred we receive for simply reporting upon Sussex pair. A meeting did take place between HMTQ & Sussex Family in private setting. HMTQ suggested a  Family photograph be taken and it was agreed by all to do so. The photograph was taken by Royal photographer and is not property of Sussex. It will remain with HMTQ and reasons for this are obvious. It was a delightful reunion and HMTQ is pleased. Tomorrow, June 4, a small gathering  will take place at Frogmore and there may be another photograph taken to mark the occasion (depending on everyone agreeing upon the idea). Rest assured the Family photographs from these brief get togethers will not be exploited!




Comments

  1. Thanks for the update! How small a party? Are the Cambridges on the guest list?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I understand that the Cambridge's are at another engagement. Can't remember but it could be in Wales.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Was the meeting just them (Sussex and Queen)? Or the family lunch they usually have after TTC (whole family)? Was the picture of all grandchildren or just Sussex children?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I’m so upset by this. Is this the much needed money shot they require for their relevance and Netflix?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like it. Though why withold the pic if you consented to taking it. But honestly how could you turn the request down politely? Withholding the picture from them can be spun just as negatively as turning down the request. I imagine we will hear all about it once the festivities are over. They will say the demand to see the photo is overwhelming to try and get HM to release it.


      Delete
    2. My understanding is that any/all pics stay with the HMTQ and that the Sussex's did were not the photographers. I really hope that I'm correct in this.

      Delete
    3. It looks like I need to do a better job of proofreading my comments. LOL

      Delete
  5. Have plans changed, are they going to do a christening?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Where on a Twitter do you post now?

    ReplyDelete
  7. D.N.A. a must !!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Were the Sussex children present?

    ReplyDelete
  9. You do not state that the children were present. Were the children, Archie and Lillibet present?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I know it sounds crazy but I swear she had the baby induced so she could be born on June 4. Ca-CHING

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would not be surprised if she did. You're talking about Meghan Markle...everything she does is calculated and manipulated to fit her narrative.

      Delete
    2. Or maybe just said she was born June 4.

      Delete
  11. Where the Cambridges and C &C in the picture?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Cambridges were in Wales for the Dayand C n C were also otherwise engaged. Both couples then attended the concert last night.

      Delete
  12. @BarkJack, so are those PR pieces in Daily Mail, Sun, etc. about the duo meeting the Queen yesterday and today's "birthday party at Frogmore" leaked by the duo /& their PR? Having a hard time believing that the BP would do this if they won't even share a photo and refuse to dignify the press with any comments. Won't these leaks annoy/anger BP?

    ReplyDelete
  13. There was no meeting, the "children" were not even there with them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Remember when it started off with the Queen going to Frogmore for the bday party, then it was multiple meetings at Windsor, then it was one meeting with Lilli, now it's a "formal" 15 minute meeting with some saying it was even shorter. Sounds like there was no meeting at all. It doesn't matter how good "sources" are, unless the Palace comes out and says it, I don't believe it. And there were no kids...how can anyone think they were there and just hidden away for the weekend? No pap shots AT ALL the whole time? You can be sure Meghan would've shoved at least Archie out to be papped while she was riding around in that bulletproof car and idiotically rolled down the window. As if she wouldn't showboat somehow if her kids were actually there, especially Lilli. The Queen isn't as sentimental as people think...I don't think she wants anything to do with Harry, definitely not Meghan and dare I say she really isn't that interested in meeting her great grandkids of this duo who are hellbent on ruining the institution she has built up and represented these last 70 years. They stole her private nickname, for god's sake. I doubt the Queen is happy with that at ALL.

      Delete
  14. I'm reposting my comment here, because it's more appropriate under this post, and I don't know how to remove it from the latest post 🤦‍♀️.
    I think the arrangements for this PJ weekend were a precaution to the couple, if you will, to PH in particular. A warning of sorts. The Queen, PC and PW telling him indirectly "Look, this reception is the consequence of your actions. We cannot promise you that it will get better, but you can be assured that it might get worse, if you continue on the same path of destructive behaviour towards RF, both as an institution and the representatives of the Monarchy and as your family. You better heed and learn, because this was the last precaution. We have finally had enough.".

    ReplyDelete
  15. Can you possibly give us an update on the party Harry & Meghan held for Lilibet's birthday? Who among the royal family showed up? Did any of the children attend (bar the Cambridge brood of course)?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Simply do not believe a word of this. It’s hard to imagine either child exists when not one person ever sees them & both birth certificates are fake ..

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hmm...well, I take it there was a photo with TQ, H&M, and the children. Very surprised by this. But totally understand why photo stays with TQ. Really surprised about the children. Did anyone attend Bday party?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT HAPPENED TO @BARKJACK

Devil is in Details

A NEW EXCLUSIVE!!!