Suspicious Behavior
Is this innocent or desperation in action?
We have all seen the incredible circumstances around Sus attendance; the seating arrangements etc. (For those wondering they did indeed make a hasty exit hi-tailing it across the pond back to the USA).
But during the Platinum Jubilee weekend...
Absolutely nothing was left to chance and much of our prior reporting about the logistics of future events post Megxit have been proven true. Once again our Palace sources are solid and you see the things we mentioned playing out during the Platinum Jubilee weekend where the Sus duo were in attendance.
Here is the bombshell question:
Do you think the pair were actually mic’d??
If true, this would have incredibly lasting, damaging repercussions for team Sussex in terms of Royal Relations. It would also set of a chain of reactions to this massive privacy breach. We also informed our fans Sus were to abide by and respect rules around not exploiting the visit for financial gain whatsoever … so, what do you guys think?
Any insight as to why they rushed out early?
ReplyDeleteProbably because a. they were booed and b. they didn't get the photo op of Lili with the Queen that they so desperately wanted. That was probably the whole reason they actually came. So once they didn't get that it was time to go.
DeleteInvitation to events but not to Royal Box.
DeleteWas the caught in the window ‘candid’ photo arranged to merch by megain?
ReplyDeleteThat hat she was wearing in her "window pose" is posted on the site "Meghan's Fashion" site. I can't imagine Zara and her husband would be too happy about their children being used to merch for Meghan. https://www.meghansfashion.com/what-meghan-wore
DeleteAnything is possible. Time will tell. However based upon the footage of when they sat down, it looked like she was fiddling with the upper part of the flap of her coat. It would have, or should have had some fixture to keep it down under that big collar. Clothes don't fit everyone the same so it could have been a case of the fixture coming loose. That would also account for the bulge in the collar in one picture I saw. But you could also say that constant fiddling with it could also signal how nervous she was.
ReplyDeleteI agree. If you look at her coat, it didn’t lay flat across her chest and actually gapped. She would tug on the button under the collar to tighten the fit. A nice hook and eye would’ve kept the coat closed and fitting properly.
DeleteI agree in part, but my understanding is the coat was Dior couture therefore it should have fitted beautifully. Surely when paying that kind of money, those issues should be less likely to occur.
DeleteYou would think. However, multiple times she's seen in expensive designer duds and they don't fit quite right. Because they need tailored. Just cause they are expensive doesn't mean they will fit. Even if something is made for you, a fitting is needed to adjust the garment to your actual body and to identify things that maybe a problem. Like the flap she keeps fiddling with.
DeleteNot only did they do the Oprah interview when they knew Philip was on his death bed (although I believe you said Oprah had them over a quid pro quo barrel) but they went so far as to imply racism and that Archie would not receive security or a title because of "concerns and conversations about how dark his skin color would be." They also said the family didn't care that Meghan was suicidal and were trapped like in a prison. Not to mention the host of other lies they were spewing. So yes, hidden mics would not be out of the realm of possibility for them to hang the royal family. Remember how they had Gayle King salivating to tell everyone Meghan had "receipts" for her all her allegations? If emotional blackmail doesn't work than they might go scorched earth to damage the monarchy. Use the recordings for content in their memoirs or some other profit. Harry was caught in New York with sneaky listening device wires on his person. Are the royals so naive as to think what Harry & Meghan did in New York was a one off? People say that recording someone without their permission is illegal in the U.K. but I would argue the royal family would NEVER prosecute Harry. They just have to have their eyes wide open to how duplicitous and low Harry would go and keep their distance & tightly manage him like they did at the Thanksgiving service so he gets limited recordings to use against them.
ReplyDeleteFrom the information I read the senior members of the family were briefed to behave as if the gruesome twosome were mic'd up and to keep conversation light. They're definitely clued up in the big hoose!
DeleteIf there's one thing we learned from this Jubilee, it's that the RF is NOT naive to the Harkles machinations and snakery. They knew full well that the duo may resort to shady (bordering on illegal) measures and as the above comment mentions, all family members were briefed to keep conversations minimal if at all around the two. How the whole weekend's events were arranged kept the Harkles at arm's length to the senior Royals. They Palace is WELL aware how exploitative and damaging Meghan and Harry can be, hence all the restrictive measures that put them in their place.
DeleteI believe this couple might resort to such measures. MM fiddled with her coat collar as soon as she started talking to Lady Sarah Chatto and the above mannerism is something I have not seen with Harry. Of course we'll probably never know but there can be very serious legal implications in behaving this way, not to mention the bridge too far for the BRF .
ReplyDeleteI sense that some sort of disagreement happened as things seemed to be even more tense than usual.
She started fiddling with the collar while still in car and immediately after getting out. She continually was adjusting it.
DeleteThe royal family did an absolutely masterful job with the Jubilee both in honoring the Queen and the UK and in corralling the Harkles. In light of the public humiliation of the Jubilee seating arrangements, etc., will there be any modification of the “June game-changer” events? Will they lay low instead or just continue as planned, acting like nothing happened and “we are still royal”?
ReplyDeleteI actually hope they did try to sneakily record things. They will never be trusted again by anyone prominent. Plus they will look like the massive hypocrites that they are for moaning about their own privacy while invading other people’s privacy by secretly filming them for Netflix.
ReplyDeleteCouldn't agree more.
DeleteBoth of them were nervously checking that the mic’s were hidden. The Queen is close to Sarah, and seating them next to her was no accident. It was hilarious to see the security guy behind them ( again no accident). Judging by the info you have, they will be complaining about how they were treated. “ he’s soo upset he needs therapy, because of his nasty family” blah blah blah. It’s never their fault 🙈
ReplyDeleteShe already failed when she merched that cheap looking pinky ring while posing in the window with Princess Anne’s grandchildren
ReplyDeleteI think the arrangements for this PJ weekend were a precaution to the couple, if you will, to PH in particular. A warning of sorts. The Queen, PC and PW telling him indirectly "Look, this reception is the consequence of your actions. We cannot promise you that it will get better, but you can be assured that it might get worse, if you continue on the same path of destructive behaviour towards RF, both as an institution and the representatives of the Monarchy and as your family. You better heed and learn, because this was the last precaution. We have finally had enough.".
ReplyDeleteRespectfully, I disagree with the idea that the way the Harkles we're treated was a, "warning" to Harry. The Queen is direct. If she warns Harry about anything, it won't be via hint or insinuation. I believe this was simply a case of Harry having gone too far & losing any more consideration for his hurt feelings. Remember how, throughout his life, the Queen had given in to Harry's temper tantrums about William getting something he didn't get. We saw how the Queen went to great lengths to accommodate Harry's hurt feelings, even as recently as the funeral for the Duke of Edinburgh. Everyone wantied to wear their military uniforms to honor the Queen's husband, had to switch to day suits because Harry was afraid he'd look bad because he LOST the right to wear his military suit when he quit the Monarchy. There are TONS of examples of the Queen affecting NUMEROUS people simply to accommodate Harry's whinging complaints.
DeleteBut the Queen has done all she could to help Harry & yet he STILL whined, cried & stabbed her in the back.
BOOM!, He went too far. The seating arrangements & restrictions put into place for the Harkles are simple, direct & absolutely unwavering. He went too far. She gave in to him too much. Now she's done with him & "messages" to him will be clear & as rigid as if they were carved into granite. No hints, no warnings, just direct, *"THIS is how it is from now on. Harry."*
The Ex head of MI5 was seated behind Harry. Also Maj. Johnny Thompson of the Scott's Guard never took his eyes off Harry. Could either gentleman have been wearing a scrambler to prevent Harry or Markle's Mic from recording? And Princess Margaret's daughter was seated beside Markle. Someone very loyal to the Queen .Let's hope the Mic did pick up the Boos
ReplyDeleteYeah, that ex-head of MI5 is now the Lord Chamberlain of the Queen's household.
DeleteThey were mic'd
ReplyDeleteHe was distracted by that shiny thing hanging from his neck. ADHD Harry
ReplyDeleteWere the duo invited to all events and just didn't go or were they only invited to the church and Trooping? Also were the Cambridges invited to Lily's birthday party? Easy to extend an 'olive branch' when it is well known the family would be in Cardiff
ReplyDeleteThe Harkles were invited to all events. Lady C's information says the duo were invited but the boo's from the crowd hit home and Hazbeen changed his mind and requested the driver be taken back to Frogmore.
DeleteOh so typical Hawwy had a strop because things weren't going his way! Honestly what did he expect? The British Public have every right to boo him and his horrible wife after everything they have said about the Royal Family and by extension the Queen. Piece of advice Hawwy, if you really despise the Royal Family as much as you say you do, and everything you claim they did is true...stay away. Actually grow a backbone, stand by your words and go and thrive with your family?....oh what's that relevance? Yeah sorry you lost that the day you left, but hey you're free from such a racist hellhole right?
ReplyDeleteI saw on tv close up of harry and megan and his tie was moving up and down and he and meghan laughed as he tried to push it down
ReplyDeleteSo disappointed in you getting into these stupid conspiracy theories. There is no reason nor chance they would mic up for a heavily television church service where the only conversation is with your pew mate. Just makes you look stupid even talking about it. Some your followers are in the royal QAnon level of nutty theories. I like you for your triple check with reliable sources reporting. Don’t demean yourself with these stupid side bars.
ReplyDeleteWhat about for the meeting with Prince Charles beforehand?
DeleteMegsie, is that you? Everyone knows exactly what she's capable of and thus why no one would even speak to her. She cannot be trusted and isn't.
DeleteThey were supposed to go to a lunch with the whole family immediately after the heavily televised church service - ‘if’ they were mic’d, I would imagine it was to record conversations at the lunch event. Also, if you watch the video of them both arriving, first, PH adjusts his ‘tie’ then he points to M’s collar and says something which prompts her to fiddle with it. It just seems odd…
DeleteThe Royal Grift YouTube Channel Found the Mic that Harry was wearing. Check out their video titled: "WAS PRINCE HARRY WEARING A MICROPHONE TOO?" Harry has been exposed.
ReplyDeleteIt did appear that Meghan was miked, but for what purpose? They wouldn’t be able to use the content with the approval of those being recorded.
ReplyDeleteTouching or adjusting a microphone would cause a lot of interference. I doubt they were mic’ed up. More likely they touched clothing to manage their discomfort and avoid eye contact with family after accusing them of terrible things.
ReplyDeleteIf someone in the Line of Succession is indeed racist, name that person so the UK and Commonwealth governments can deal with it. But leaving the name unsaid puts the shadow of racism over all of them (unfairly).
I know someone in the Line Of Succession who is a racist ... Harry
DeleteFrom the photos I have seen they were bith mic'd up. Thank goodness the family was firm on where they sat for events. I think they wanted the Yorks to move over so they could have isle seats so they get behind William and Kate in the percession.
ReplyDeleteMeghan could have been nervous that a tag would drop and expose that the coat was not purchased, as a possibility. I haven't seen anything that is clearly a mic or body cam on either of them. Not to say they weren't but I haven't seen any clear indication of the mountain of stills & video I've watched. There's one that has an alleged wire at the back of her head. Sorry but somebody messed with that still. Thinned it out & made it a hard line. There's too many stills showing that CLEARLY its her hair coming out from the bun. So that's the problem, we have too many people who are manipulating stills/video trying to convince everyone they were micced up. There's also the story that there was equipment that was triggered by their devices. Charles was told and he sent a message that they disregarded the rules and were sent home. Not sure I believe that either.
ReplyDeleteI know this is another topic but this doesn't seem to be a gamechanger PR month as yet, more like a bit of petulance via their low level mouthpieces, and some unsuccessful polo. Did the booing stop their plans or frighten sponsors? Where is Archetypes which was supposed to air this month? Another Spotify failure? I'd love to know what went wrong as the September 2021 PR prediction was certainly spot on.
ReplyDeleteThe hat she wore while "posing" herself in the window at Trooping the Color is shown on the site "Meghan's Fashion". I'm not sure how that site works, but I would think Zara wouldn't be happy her children are on it helping to merch for markle. https://www.meghansfashion.com/what-meghan-wore
ReplyDeletehow do i send you a message? Are you aware there is a Facebook page called Senator Markle selling products using M, H, PW, Diana's faces in their ads? All products are pro megsy - also an Etsy page and an Instagram page.
ReplyDelete