Sunday Reads
- Hilaria Baldwin says she's temporarily quitting social media (who cares?!)
Temporarily quitting social media and announcing it is enough to generate easy headlines!
-Priyanka Chopra not a fan of Rosie O'Donnell and has yet to release baby's name!
-Miley Cyrus dating a guy named Maxx Morando and are said to be quite compatible. They are on vacation in Cabo San Lucas.
-Megxit was planned. Ok --- rogue publicity and stah-dom was most definitely planned - but that's exactly what got them canned. Markle had been cooking up her own drama that the Palace had forewarned her about, culminating in the letter to her dad. She was warned not to enact her gasconade plan about having 5 pre-approved sources with their pre-approved messages go talk to Sussex-friendly outlet, People Magazine. When Meg went and released the hounds anyway, chaos ensued. Our Palace insiders say she was relentlessly counseled on publicity and communications to no avail (she did what she wanted anyway). She was advised of PRESS protocols with respect to members of the Royal Family and ignored much of it. She was regularly admonished about attitude and respect (or lack of it). She continued fostering media relations with outlets like People & attempted to shake Disneys & Apple's tree while still working as a Royal. Many of her motives and actions were openly questioned and this is how we have this information. We exclusively told our Twitter followers about pitches they ALREADY had lined up in January 2020 for Netflix, Spotify, Apple, Hulu and other media giants. It's easy for people to say they have a "Palace source" but keep in mind, for over 9 years operating as this handle we have never wavered, we regularly tell you the truth months in advance and multiple times we were vindicated and proven right.
There is no need to force anyone to believe us; things we tell our followers reveal themselves in due time.
On top of that, information we present to you is triple verified.
Here are some of our Tweets from 2020 about them pitching media giants...
once again you all saw it play out.
No, the pair did not plan on HMTQ booting them entirely and saying NO! to their hair trigger requests when they first announced "MEGXIT".
H&M promised Oprah something for her "birthday" (January) as far back as at the Wedding. The Oprah interview was "making good" on that promise. Think about that and remember we told you basically Oprah had them "by the balls". As many of you know the timing of their interview was despicable. Despite full well knowing for several weeks HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh was considered actively dying - his body shutting down- refusing food and drink - the pair soldiered on with their famed "tell all" to big O. To many in The Family, this act was considered callous, cunning and unforgivable.
The pair had also been working on documentaries as far back as FALL 2019. We broke the news of Megxit December 2019 saying the pair were set to take an INDEFINITE hiatus! We knew they were pitching major production houses in January 2020 and some existing material was cited as an example of what they planned to produce. Our keen followers have always known the details before the news hits traditional media. Thank you for standing by us!
You are the best! What do you think about the current "rumour" of them coming back (half in) when Charles is king?
ReplyDeleteThis will not happen under any circumstances at this point. While the pair are still "family" and always will be, they have undoubtedly committed heinous, unforgivable acts against The Royal Family and The Institution (most particular the actions surrounding Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh's death). It is perhaps being confused that the pair intend to honor familial invitations and commitments, rather than Royal ones.
DeleteThank you!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am curious about what are Charles' feelings toward the pair? Lots of gossip that Harry & Meghan believe Charles will relent and allow them a 1/2 in 1/2 out model as royals, especially if the criticism in Harry's memoir isn't too damaging. Why won't the queen address the Counsellors of State situation? We know Parliament will have to be the ones to adjudicate the matter, but they won't act until Her Majesty indicates a desire to make changes.
ReplyDeleteThe 1/2 in 1/2 out will not happen under any circumstances at this point. Quote it, screen shot it, save it. It won't happen it is totally detrimental to the entire fabric of The Monarchy. While the pair are still "family" and always will be, they have undoubtedly committed heinous, unforgivable acts against The Royal Family and The Institution (most particular the actions surrounding Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh's death. It is perhaps being confused that the pair intend to honor familial invitations and commitments, rather than Royal ones. This is not my speculation, this is the sentiment from within Palace Walls, the two are no longer welcome in any Royal Capacity and won't be in future! Much discussion has taken place about this action between HMTQ & PC. Hope this clears up all those rumors.
ReplyDeleteAnd besides it took years for PC reputation to recover after the PD debacle, i honestly think he won't risk it just to accommodate the Duo
DeleteThere can't be a half in-half out arrangement because it sets up the monarchy to its demise. Public officials need to set what standards they will adhere to. They can't choose when they are beholden to the public and when they are going to act in their own interest. It makes self-imposed standards arbitrary and cherry-picking. Further, they are squeamish at public scrutiny. Their actions evade transparency and authenticity. They value their privacy too much. It would be better suited for both parties that H and M continue as non-working royals. This way, both the existence of the monarchy and H and M's private interests are protected. Besides, H and M are no longer "trapped" and "silenced." Coming back makes everything they said on the O interview nonsensical.
Delete'The 1/2 in 1/2 out will not happen under any circumstances at this point.'
DeleteI like this comment, until we get to the words 'at this point'!!!
Surely the Charles or the Royal Family can't think the British public would ever accept this scenario?
I have been hearing rumors of Meghan and Harry heading for divorce. Any truth to this?
ReplyDeleteI've been waiting for the proper time to discuss it to be quite honest as it is such a sensitive topic. We're in the process of verifying a few reports of volatility. It's not going good due to a ton of resentment. They are turbulent but still quite tolerant of one another.
DeleteYou're awesome! I trust you 100%, not just with Megxit but every celebrity new. I hope you can come back on twitter, you are missed ❤️
ReplyDeleteThank you. I try; I haven't yet but perhaps soon. We appealed the suspension and made account barkjack_ as backup. Thanks for your support!
ReplyDeleteWeren't they shopping around to streaming services as early as late 2018? Quimby amd Netflix.
ReplyDeleteHey BarkJack
ReplyDeleteA question from a friend :
I would like to know why they bailed on Balmoral that summer - what mischief did mm get up that she wouldn’t go and two was it because she was caught behind the Rose story
From what I know about that time you refer to there was much tension about respect for position. Explanation: in any production, play or presentation everyone has a mark. Appearances are calculated to the footstep just as lines are rehearsed and scenes are practiced. Life is live and when the curtain went up Harry and Meghan often forgot the plot. There are several video examples of uncouth or ungracious behavior: pushing ahead (getting in car before HMTQ), blocking shots or walking into the background of key shots (Palace gala marks 50 years since Prince Charles' investiture). As these moments can be explained away by nerves or newbie mistakes much humble resignation was afforded to the pair in their new limelight. The icing on the "cake" however, underscoring a hotbed of tension among family members at that time, was breathtaking attitude and confrontational clashes with staff (security, comms), Family and institution. Full stop.
Delete@BarkJack I don’t remember but did you confirm on Twitter that it was Merchie who started the Rose affair rumors because she wasn’t allowed to attend the Buckingham Palace dinner party with Harry and Harry was put with Rose and Markle was jealous and started the rumor?
DeleteOh boy you are just fabulous and fair with your information. There's so much rumor and speculation it's difficult to find the truth. Let me pose this, there is a great deal of rumor that Charles and Meghan had some kind of affair early on. Don't know if sexual per se but certainly overly affectionate. Any truth? It's been around a while.
ReplyDeleteI heard the same and Camilla doesn’t like Markle because of it and that’s why they won’t be allowed back and who could blame her I’m surprised Markle’s face isn’t rearranged lol
Delete