Info on June 2022
June has been slated as another S² "CHANGEMAKER" month as they like to call them.
Another 'September 2021', if you will.
We knew this before it was confirmed that the Archetypes podcast would launch.
Over the Easter weekend we received credible and verifiable emails around the publicity push ahead.
June 2022 is set to be nauseatingly busy for S-Club.
Despite strict protocols for non-working members of the BRF, please note that it may be likely the two are "in attendance" in the background - again - not being photographed. Surely NOT on the balcony. It is not a stretch to say they may be invited to attend (privately)!
It became clear over the weekend that visits certainly can take place without photos splashed about for the entire world to see. Remember this.
Having said that, it would be a spectacular opportunity and touching gesture to actually bring both children back to see HMTQ in her very special, unique year. Will it finally happen in June?
I have no beef if the Sussexes want to reunite with the family as long as it is OUT OF VIEW. They are only depriving their own children by keeping them away. However, I DO have an issue with the Harkles turning the balcony into a stage for the Sussex family to make their debut.
ReplyDeleteHow funny though if they are made to stay in the back out of sight & Catherine & William bring Archie & Lily onto the balcony (after all the children are blameless).
DeleteThat would be amazing but you know MEGzit isn't having any if that
DeleteBlameless or not I’m not interested in seeing Harkle offspring on the balcony. They will never serve as Senior Royals and are nothing to the British people. Let them enjoy meeting grandma and other relatives in private.
DeleteI think most would agree!
ReplyDeleteIt would not be appropriate for children widely held to be of unknown provenance - i.e. who are their gestational mother(s), who are their genetic father(s) - to be turned into spectacles on the balcony. If the privacy of these children is so important to Harry and Meghan that they felt the need to go to extreme tragi-comedic lengths to keep basic, verifiable details of their births secret, then parading them in front of cameras seems excessively hypocritical, even by their standards.
DeleteThank you for changing the color scheme, much easier to read :)
ReplyDeleteI do not believe any children exist in their custody
ReplyDeleteI take issue with the fact that they continue leaking and using BRF for their marketing/branding purpose. Take the latest: haznob saying to BBC that HMTQ, if she could, she would have attended IG, which is abuse of BRF of goodwill and the Queen's/PC's in particular. The Queen has never attended IG, and it's not an event which she would attend, because it's outside of her scope of interests, if you will. Haznob using their leaked visit (by their own camp), for their own good $$$.
ReplyDeleteSo, if they are to attend the jubilee, even if privately, we can be assured of continuous leaks from their side. They've already leaked to the Daily Mirror and The Sun, who were hammering the Cambridges during their Caribbean tour, but now, are kissing up to the sucks-its. Even if there'll be no photos, etc, the duo will make sure to leak as much as they can, to monetize this visit, and let everyone know how the visit went down, how everyone behaved, and so on. They can NOT be trusted ever. Thank God, Prince William doesn't trust them.
If you say there will be a big PR push in June then there will be. However it will turn in to a fizzer just like the September PR push. If the duo turn up on the balcony with the family that will undermine the Oprah interview and their constantly whingeing narrative. It may also undermine claims in Harry's book. Further, it could seriously damage Harry's security court case. They have created a tangled Web.
ReplyDeleteTotal humiliation for Oprah even if they go back on family visits...either way it makes ginge and cringe look terrible and total hypocrites...
DeleteI love your fabulous posts!! Family is family and business is business. I think it would be wonderful for HMTQ to see her great grandchildren without the focus being on the vile Harkles. Behind closed doors reunions are great, but nobody wants the Jubilee to be about anyone but HMTQ. I have faith that Anne, William, Andrew and Edward will see to the Harkles being placed in their proper place.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct!
DeleteSince visits can happen un-noticed, what better reason for the children to attend in a familial setting.
Going forward HMTQ has put in place a top-tier alliance which shall hold Prince Charles accountable to duty.
Thank you!
DeleteSince visits can happen unnoticed, they should come back in May with the children to get them acclimated to the surroundings and the family that they basically do not know. Can imagine how overwhelmed little ones can be during all of the busy celebrations and commotion of the Jubilee without adding the stress of being in unfamiliar surroundings with people they’ve never seen before. Would be best for them to have a pre-run through and come in May with the children, get them accustomed to the surroundings and the family, then when they come back in June it will be easier on the children.
DeleteExactly. The ball is clearly in their court to bring the children now.
DeleteI am not convinced there are any children. Hence the games and excuses not to bring them to the UK
DeleteToo many videos of inflating and deflating bellies over minutes at events prove that no real pregnancy ever occurred.
Deletei don't believe they will let it be possible that dna could be taken. assuming, kids.
ReplyDeleteSo interesting!!!!
DeleteWell, to take a DNA, one hair strand would be enough, I believe, wouldn't it? That doesn't seem like much effort at all.
DeleteI wish the Press wouldn't give them so much attention. If they do come for the Jubilee, they should be 'unseen' otherwise the press will just focus on them all the time.
ReplyDelete@BarkJack Can you get us an update on the bullying enquiry? It either seems to be taking a very long time, or the RF are hoping everyone will forget about it.
ReplyDeleteThe RF has been dutifully following up but some are slow to provide evidence or have already moved on from the situation and do not seek to re-open it.
DeleteIf Markle can't be photographed with The Queen, she'll be furious. She wants those photos badly. But I'm glad its NO.
ReplyDeleteWhile I don't hold Ginge and Cringe against the children, I believe the circumstances of their respective births must me established. Unless they are genetically proven to be from both "parents" AND that Cringe actually delivered them after a real pregnancy, then they need to be removed from the LoS. Just my two cents. Enough of the subterfuge from these two.
ReplyDeleteI hope the Family remembers what happened with Charles' 50th Investiture anniversary - if The Sussexes are allowed onto the central balcony, they will push their way into the pictures like they did then. They know a scene won't be made & will push those limits, esp. when the payoff is so great.
ReplyDeleteWhat the BRF should be doing right now is letting it be known only working royals will be on the central balcony and non-working royals are on the side balconies. This will prevent (1) Sussexes from forcing their way alongside senior royals and (2) ad-nauseum Sussex PR about will they/won't they appear on the balcony, which WILL make the appearance all about them and not Her Majesty...
The BRF needs to set the rules now, whatever they may be, or Sussex press will gain the upper hand/talking points.
There are no guarantees that the Queen will be able to attend any Jubilee celebrations, let alone make a balcony appearance. She is, after all, 96 years old and suffering mobility issues. With this in mind, I seriously doubt that an invitation was extended to appear on the balcony.
ReplyDeleteI do not want to see #JudasHarry or his vile wife or their 2 children ANYWHERE in the UK especially participating in the Queen's Platinum Jubilee celebrations! They're not needed or wanted, proven repeated liars and traitor's!
ReplyDeleteWell, turns out photographs WERE splashed around the world for all to see despite the invite "with conditions". Though they weren't official photographs, this certainly wasn't a visit where they weren't allowed to "show face" because Markle still managed to roll down her window in the car and conveniently appear next to a window at BP without those courtiers doing anything to stop her. They were photographed in that church just as much as they normally would be. So they still kind of showed face. I expected them to be featured a lot less given the info you got from an insider. Didn't seem to be that accurate.
ReplyDelete