Look Carefully on Twitter for THIS...
Colossus new Sussex publicity across Twitter happening now.
Their team has brokered a big feature with "Fatherly HQ"
They spent a big budget promoting it on Twitter.
You'll see the topic under "Whats Happening"
But notice how those 3 dots are missing from the topic?
They paid extra for this. You cannot hide it or deem it un-interesting.
It's not the first time team 'sus' have done this! It's a regular thing given the amount of backlash they get.
Take a look....Notice the three dots are on every topic except the final topic.
Clicking the 3 dots on any topic will give you the option to voice your dis-like.
Often PAID-for PROMOTED topics do not come with those 3 dots.
But there's more...
By default, paid-for spots on the "What's Trending" sidebar are labelled "Promoted".
But you can pay even more money to hide the fact that it's a promoted topic.
The ad won't say "promoted". They paid even more to ensure it's inconspicuous, while also eliminating the opportunity for anyone to dislike the topic. They also pay to ensure that "3-dot" option to label the topic as spammy or uninteresting is missing.
Try it yourself and keep an eye out for this while you try to enjoy Twitter.
Don't be fooled by people who pay to get slid into "Whats Happening"
So again, here is more evidence that Team Sus are utilizing Twitter to their full advantage and they are splurging on quite a hefty marketing and public relations budget.
So again, here is more evidence that Team Sus are utilizing Twitter to their full advantage and they are splurging on quite a hefty marketing and public relations budget.
No amount of their PR puff will help them!. Thanks for letting us know in advance, as usual, @BarkJack! I don't know have Twitter account, but like everyone else can read it even without an account, and it's always good to know what's genuine content and what it paid for.
ReplyDeleteI hope that the media (British media in particular) will take a note of this PR push and write about "privacy-loving" duo and how they continue to push themselves to the fore.
I wonder, how ethical is such push by Twitter and as a business practice? Shouldn't this ad (which is what it is) be disclosed as a paid content, like it's done on YouTube or Instagram? I hope that someone will bring this up to the proper authorities, even on Twitter itself.
Hhmm…so who exactly coughs up the moolah for all these??
ReplyDeleteThe duo don’t have a bottomless pit of money (she has nothing while he depends on his family - inheritance is limited & controlled?)
I’d love to know that myself someone on tumblr said Harry and his wife are asking such a disgusting amount of money for invictus that sponsors and investors are pulling out of invictus he’s bankrupting it and has Russian oligarchs as backers I think they both made a deal with the devil for more money fame etc
DeleteLet them burn ALL of their money … fast!!!
DeleteI had noticed that and wondered. I don't consider myself too twitter savvy, more of a light hobbyist if you will so I thank you for the heads up. It is frankly disturbing how easily we in the public are manipulated by pr subterfuge.
ReplyDeleteThis will be just money down the drain. It won't get them what they want. It won't get them an invite to the Oscars or the Met Gala. It's not like Obama is going to say, "Oh, look, Harry is talking to his son about disabilities....let's invite them to our next big party". It won't get Meghan a featured role in a blockbuster or a big contract with Chanel.
ReplyDeleteIf what they want is World Domination, these kind of PR stunts is just a waste of whatever money they have to pay for it.
It's the same thing they did with the TIME cover. What did they get out of that? Nothing.
Well said.
DeleteOh, they got something out of the Time magazine cover. World wide ridicule.
DeleteThe memes that came out because of that Time mag cover was entertaining to say the least.
DeleteI blocked it
ReplyDeletePr will be meaningless without anything to offer. They should be focussing on fulfilling their contracts and producing interesting content. Otherwise it's like pouring money down a black hole.
ReplyDelete👍
DeleteThe baffling thing is that the people who's approval they desperately need and want will see exactly what they are doing because they are savvy to these sorts of PR tactics. It just makes them look more and more desperate and pathetic.They have already lost the public for the most part. It's way too late. They are a lost cause hurling money into an empty pit. It would be sad if they weren't so odious.
ReplyDeleteThey're wasting their money! no-one is remotely interested & will simply scroll by lol. Money down the drain in my opinion, I dread to think of exactly how much cash they spend on PR, I bet it's an eye-watering amount though 😬💰💰
ReplyDeleteBeing good clients for Tweeter I now understand that they had asked for taking down some accounts
ReplyDeleteSo you actually can remove it from your “for you” by blocking the account posting it. I just went in and blocked “Fatherly” and it disappeared from mine.
ReplyDeleteShe seems to have no problem running thru his inheritance. And his inheritance is the one thing she. legally . isn't entitled to and he just lets her blow it.
ReplyDeleteI think it’s hilarious how she bragged before they married that she had 5 million of her own money and her feral fans love spouting it too and they thought that shows she wasn’t a gold digger but yet they leave the Royal family and not once has that ghetto trashy homely looking woman paid for anything I hope Harry is happy with her because his inheritance is going going gone and I wouldn’t be surprised if she has been stealing money from him she’ll leave him if she can find another rich sucker but it’s not looking good she’s old and looks it really rode hard and put away wet and no amount of plastic surgery will ever make her clean looking
ReplyDeleteDoesn’t Harry know what a mess he’s made of things by listening to her? He’s got to realize now how full of crap she is now
ReplyDeleteOh come now, let's not blame every thing on Markle. Harry has always been problematic; it's just that Palace PR protected the public from knowing his personality problems. As a boy he was known as a bully at school and prone to start fights for no reason. Harry simply found in Markle a kindred spirit / partner in crime.
DeleteI’ve seen this on my Twitter feed. BarkJack nails it once again! Thank you. ❤️
ReplyDeleteI KNEW IT WAS THEIR DODGY PR STUNT!! As soon as I read the 3rd… 4th… 8th (?) consecutive tweet about Hawwy talking to his toddler about the deep subject of physical handicaps, I KNEW it was PR! Nobody pushes fairytales more than their hired mouthpieces. They’re so messed up and I can’t believe how juvenile they are to try to make people believe the drivel they keep spooning out. Thank you TLF for bringing us the Truth!
ReplyDeleteThe 3 dots are there on the exact ad in Fatherly today, Apr 29. If shows the add running fir 2 days. If you go to the Fatherly Twitter feed, everyone of their ads has the three dots. Maybe the dots return after say, 24 hrs of dot-less advertising.
ReplyDeleteLet's add to the list: No White House Correspondents dinner invite (side-eyeing MM's "political" aspirations). Someone should ask Senator Gillibrand whatever happened to that bipartisan female senators dinner she was going to have Meghan attend. Or did Gillibrand drop it altogether when the senators told her they were busy that night... before she told them the date. LMAO
ReplyDeleteFascinating insight into how easily money can manipulate public information (as an aside, the correlation between the public figures incessantly commenting on disinformation typically being the ones who rely on mistruths being spread widely is equally fascinating). It's utterly repugnant how the two people who publicly treat their own fathers with contempt and disdain cynically jump on the father bandwagon - nacho's recent tweets about the polo club in montecito is all about fathers and it was clear even before I read this post that there was a very curated PR push. Too bad for hazno and TW that nothing they say or do has any credibility.
ReplyDeleteGot another "no three dot" article today concerning the "rare" bday photo of Lili. Annoying how the duo needs to pay to push this and no one cares. On the other hand, they must be burning through their cash to promote puff pieces like these so it's on them.
ReplyDelete